Boon or curse? A contingent view on the relationship between strategic planning and organizational ambidexterity

A. Posch, C. Garaus

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelBegutachtung


Numerous scholars have attempted to explain which factors allow for organizational ambidexterity. Strategic planning, as a possible antecedent, has not been considered so far. This is surprising because strategic planning is among the most widely used strategic decision-making tools in management practice and one of the most extensively studied concepts in management research. In addition, prior research has demonstrated the potential of strategic planning to impact innovation-related outcomes—both positively and negatively. Here, we investigate the association between strategic planning and organizational ambidexterity using a survey of 217 senior executives. We highlight the importance of considering how executives use strategic planning. Our results support the hypothesis that strategic planning's positive or negative association with organizational ambidexterity is contingent on other organizational factors. Our findings reveal that strategic planning is only positively associated with organizational ambidexterity when leaders' innovation orientation is extraordinarily high. We further contextualize this interaction effect by considering the environmental uncertainty perceived by the top management. This work contributes to the literature by examining the antecedents of organizational ambidexterity.

FachzeitschriftLong Range Planning
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Dez. 2020
Extern publiziertJa


Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Boon or curse? A contingent view on the relationship between strategic planning and organizational ambidexterity“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Dieses zitieren