Zur Hauptnavigation wechseln Zur Suche wechseln Zum Hauptinhalt wechseln

Comparative study between virus neutralisation testing and other serological methods detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Europe, 2021

  • Ramona Mögling
  • , Johan Reimerink
  • , Kamelia R Stanoeva
  • , Maria Keramarou
  • , Raquel Guiomar
  • , Inês Costa
  • , Anu Haveri
  • , Barbara Holzer
  • , Gülay Korukluoğlu
  • , Trung Nguyen
  • , Gatis Pakarna
  • , Katarzyna Pancer
  • , Katarina Prosenc Trilar
  • , Jelena Protic
  • , Marijana Stojanović
  • , Riccardo De Santis
  • , Florigio Lista
  • , Teodora Vremera
  • , Mihaela Leustean
  • , Adriana Pistol
  • Hana Zelena, Chantal Reusken, Eeva K Broberg
  • National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM)
  • European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC)
  • The National Institute of Health Dr Ricardo Jorge
  • Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL)
  • Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety GmbH
  • Public Health General Directorate of Turkey
  • Laboratoire National de Santé
  • Riga East Clinical University Hospital
  • National Institute of Public Health NIH-NRI
  • National Laboratory for Health
  • CAS - Wuhan Institute of Virology
  • Brooke Army Medical Center
  • Institute of Public Health Ostrava
  • National Institute for Public Health

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelBegutachtung

Abstract

One consequence of the ongoing coronavirus disease pandemic was the rapid development of both in-house and commercial serological assays detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, in an effort to reliably detect acute and past SARS-CoV-2 infections. It is crucial to evaluate the quality of these serological tests and consequently the sero-epidemiological studies that are performed with the respective tests. Here, we describe the set-up and results of a comparative study, in which a laboratory contracted by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control offered a centralised service to EU/EEA Member and pre-accession Member States to test representative serum specimens with known serological results, with the gold standard technique (virus neutralisation tests) to determine the presence of neutralising antibodies. Laboratories from 12 European countries shared 719 serum specimens with the contractor laboratory. We found that in-house serological tests detecting neutralising antibodies showed the highest percent agreement, both positive and negative, with the virus neutralisation test results. Despite extensive differences in virus neutralisation protocols neutralisation titres showed a strong correlation. From the commercial assays, the best positive percent agreement was found for SARS-CoV-2 IgG (sCOVG) (Siemens - Atellica IM Analyzer). Despite lower positive percent agreement of LIAISON SARS-CoV-2 TrimericS IgG kit (Diasorin Inc.), the obtained results showed relatively good correlation with neutralisation titres. The set-up of this study allowed for high comparability between laboratories and enabled laboratories that do not have the capacity or capability to perform VNTs themselves. Given the variety of in-house protocols detecting SARS-CoV-2 specific neutralising antibodies, including the virus strain, it could be of interest to select reference isolates for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic to be made available for interested EU Member States and pre-accession countries.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer114825
Seiten (von - bis)114825
FachzeitschriftJournal of Virological Methods
Jahrgang322
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Dez. 2023
Extern publiziertJa

UN SDGs

Dieser Output leistet einen Beitrag zu folgendem(n) Ziel(en) für nachhaltige Entwicklung

  1. SDG 3 – Gute Gesundheit und Wohlergehen
    SDG 3 – Gute Gesundheit und Wohlergehen

ÖFOS 2012 - Österreichischen Systematik der Wissenschaftszweige

  • 304005 Medizinische Biotechnologie

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Comparative study between virus neutralisation testing and other serological methods detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Europe, 2021“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Dieses zitieren