TY - JOUR
T1 - Evidence-based occupational health and safety interventions: A comprehensive overview of reviews
AU - Teufer, B.
AU - Ebenberger, A.
AU - Affengruber, L.
AU - Kien, C.
AU - Klerings, I.
AU - Szelag, M.
AU - Grillich, L.
AU - Griebler, U.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding This overview of reviews was funded by the Austrian General Accident Insurance Institution (Allgemeine Unfallversicherung, AUVA). The funding source had no role in the collection, analysis or interpretation of data.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
PY - 2019/12/11
Y1 - 2019/12/11
N2 - Objectives Occupational injuries and diseases are a huge public health problem and cause extensive suffering and loss of productivity. Nevertheless, many occupational health and safety (OHS) guidelines are still not based on the best available evidence. In the last decade, numerous systematic reviews on behavioural, relational and mixed interventions to reduce occupational injuries and diseases have been carried out, but a comprehensive synopsis is yet missing. The aim of this overview of reviews is to provide a comprehensive basis to inform evidence-based decision-making about interventions in the field of OHS. Methods We conducted an overview of reviews. We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), the Cochrane Library (Wiley), epistemonikos.org and Scopus (Elsevier) for relevant systematic reviews published between January 2008 and June 2018. Two authors independently screened abstracts and full-text publications and determined the risk of bias of the included systematic reviews with the ROBIS (Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews) tool. Results We screened 2287 abstracts and 200 full-texts for eligibility. Finally, we included 25 systematic reviews with a low risk of bias for data synthesis and analysis. We identified systematic reviews on the prevention of occupational injuries, musculoskeletal, skin and lung diseases, occupational hearing impairment and interventions without specific target diseases. Several interventions led to consistently positive results on individual diseases; other interventions did not show any effects, or the studies are contradictory. We provide detailed results on all included interventions. Discussion To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive overview of behavioural, relational and mixed interventions and their effectiveness in preventing occupational injuries and diseases. It provides policymakers with an important basis for making evidence-based decisions on interventions in this field. PROSPERO registration number CRD42018100341.
AB - Objectives Occupational injuries and diseases are a huge public health problem and cause extensive suffering and loss of productivity. Nevertheless, many occupational health and safety (OHS) guidelines are still not based on the best available evidence. In the last decade, numerous systematic reviews on behavioural, relational and mixed interventions to reduce occupational injuries and diseases have been carried out, but a comprehensive synopsis is yet missing. The aim of this overview of reviews is to provide a comprehensive basis to inform evidence-based decision-making about interventions in the field of OHS. Methods We conducted an overview of reviews. We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), the Cochrane Library (Wiley), epistemonikos.org and Scopus (Elsevier) for relevant systematic reviews published between January 2008 and June 2018. Two authors independently screened abstracts and full-text publications and determined the risk of bias of the included systematic reviews with the ROBIS (Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews) tool. Results We screened 2287 abstracts and 200 full-texts for eligibility. Finally, we included 25 systematic reviews with a low risk of bias for data synthesis and analysis. We identified systematic reviews on the prevention of occupational injuries, musculoskeletal, skin and lung diseases, occupational hearing impairment and interventions without specific target diseases. Several interventions led to consistently positive results on individual diseases; other interventions did not show any effects, or the studies are contradictory. We provide detailed results on all included interventions. Discussion To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive overview of behavioural, relational and mixed interventions and their effectiveness in preventing occupational injuries and diseases. It provides policymakers with an important basis for making evidence-based decisions on interventions in this field. PROSPERO registration number CRD42018100341.
KW - clinical decision making
KW - Cochrane Library
KW - data analysis
KW - data synthesis
KW - evidence based practice
KW - human
KW - intervention study
KW - Medline
KW - musculoskeletal disease
KW - occupational accident
KW - occupational deafness
KW - occupational disease
KW - occupational health
KW - occupational lung disease
KW - occupational safety
KW - occupational skin disease
KW - publication
KW - publication bias
KW - quality assessment tool
KW - Review
KW - risk assessment
KW - risk of bias in systematic reviews tool
KW - Scopus
KW - statistically significant result
KW - systematic review (topic)
KW - evidence based medicine
KW - procedures
KW - public health
KW - safety
KW - Evidence-Based Medicine
KW - Humans
KW - Occupational Diseases
KW - Occupational Health
KW - Public Health
KW - Safety Management
KW - occupational diseases
KW - occupational health and safety
KW - OHS
KW - occupational injuries
KW - overview of reviews
KW - Occupational Diseases/prevention & control
KW - Public Health/standards
KW - Safety Management/methods
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85076421904&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032528
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032528
M3 - Review article
C2 - 31831544
SN - 2044-6055
VL - 9
SP - e032528
JO - BMJ Open
JF - BMJ Open
IS - 12
M1 - e032528
ER -