Evidence-based occupational health and safety interventions: A comprehensive overview of reviews

B. Teufer, A. Ebenberger, L. Affengruber, C. Kien, I. Klerings, M. Szelag, L. Grillich, U. Griebler

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Objectives Occupational injuries and diseases are a huge public health problem and cause extensive suffering and loss of productivity. Nevertheless, many occupational health and safety (OHS) guidelines are still not based on the best available evidence. In the last decade, numerous systematic reviews on behavioural, relational and mixed interventions to reduce occupational injuries and diseases have been carried out, but a comprehensive synopsis is yet missing. The aim of this overview of reviews is to provide a comprehensive basis to inform evidence-based decision-making about interventions in the field of OHS. Methods We conducted an overview of reviews. We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), the Cochrane Library (Wiley), epistemonikos.org and Scopus (Elsevier) for relevant systematic reviews published between January 2008 and June 2018. Two authors independently screened abstracts and full-text publications and determined the risk of bias of the included systematic reviews with the ROBIS (Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews) tool. Results We screened 2287 abstracts and 200 full-texts for eligibility. Finally, we included 25 systematic reviews with a low risk of bias for data synthesis and analysis. We identified systematic reviews on the prevention of occupational injuries, musculoskeletal, skin and lung diseases, occupational hearing impairment and interventions without specific target diseases. Several interventions led to consistently positive results on individual diseases; other interventions did not show any effects, or the studies are contradictory. We provide detailed results on all included interventions. Discussion To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive overview of behavioural, relational and mixed interventions and their effectiveness in preventing occupational injuries and diseases. It provides policymakers with an important basis for making evidence-based decisions on interventions in this field. PROSPERO registration number CRD42018100341.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere032528
Pages (from-to)e032528
JournalBMJ Open
Volume9
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Dec 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • clinical decision making
  • Cochrane Library
  • data analysis
  • data synthesis
  • evidence based practice
  • human
  • intervention study
  • Medline
  • musculoskeletal disease
  • occupational accident
  • occupational deafness
  • occupational disease
  • occupational health
  • occupational lung disease
  • occupational safety
  • occupational skin disease
  • publication
  • publication bias
  • quality assessment tool
  • Review
  • risk assessment
  • risk of bias in systematic reviews tool
  • Scopus
  • statistically significant result
  • systematic review (topic)
  • evidence based medicine
  • procedures
  • public health
  • safety
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Humans
  • Occupational Diseases
  • Occupational Health
  • Public Health
  • Safety Management
  • occupational diseases
  • occupational health and safety
  • OHS
  • occupational injuries
  • overview of reviews
  • Occupational Diseases/prevention & control
  • Public Health/standards
  • Safety Management/methods

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evidence-based occupational health and safety interventions: A comprehensive overview of reviews'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this