Identifying outcomes for depression that matter to patients, informal caregivers, and health-care professionals: qualitative content analysis of a large international online survey

A. Chevance, P. Ravaud, A. Tomlinson, C. Le Berre, B. Teufer, S. Touboul, E.I. Fried, G. Gartlehner, A. Cipriani, V.T. Tran

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Many clinical trials have assessed treatments for depressive disorders and bipolar depression. However, whether, and which, assessed outcome domains really matter to patients, informal caregivers, and health-care professionals remains unclear. Methods: We did an international online survey in French, German, and English. Participants were adult patients with a history of depression, informal caregivers, and health-care professionals, recruited by purposeful sampling. To identify outcome domains, participants answered four open-ended questions about their expectations for depression treatment. We disseminated the survey without restriction via social media, patient and professional associations, and a media campaign. Four researchers independently did qualitative content analyses. We assessed data saturation using mathematical models to ensure the comprehensive identification of outcome domains. Findings: Between April 5, 2018, and Dec 10, 2018, 1912 patients, 464 informal caregivers, and 627 health-care professionals from 52 countries provided 8183 open-ended answers. We identified 80 outcome domains related to symptoms (64 domains), such as mental pain (or psychological or psychic pain, 523 [17%] of 3003 participants) and motivation (384 [13%]), and functioning (16 domains), such as social isolation (541 [18%]). We identified 57 other outcome domains regarding safety of treatment, health care organisation, and social representation, such as stigmatisation (408 [14%]). Interpretation: This study provides a list of outcome domains important to patients, informal caregivers, and health-care professionals. Unfortunately, many of these domains are rarely measured in clinical trials. Results from this study should set the foundation for a core outcome set for depression. Funding: Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale and NIHR Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)692-702
Number of pages11
JournalThe Lancet Psychiatry
Volume7
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • adult
  • aged
  • anxiety
  • Article
  • automutilation
  • caregiver
  • cognitive defect
  • content analysis
  • depression
  • expectation
  • female
  • general practitioner
  • health care organization
  • health care personnel
  • health survey
  • human
  • male
  • mass medium
  • mental patient
  • motivation
  • nurse
  • outcome assessment
  • patient safety
  • priority journal
  • psychiatrist
  • psychologist
  • qualitative analysis
  • social isolation
  • social media
  • social stigma
  • suicidal ideation
  • suicide attempt
  • symptomatology
  • violence
  • Austria
  • epidemiology
  • evaluation study
  • France
  • Germany
  • middle aged
  • North America
  • pain
  • physiology
  • psychology
  • questionnaire
  • stereotyping
  • United Kingdom
  • Adult
  • Caregivers
  • Depression
  • Evaluation Studies as Topic
  • Female
  • Health Personnel
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Motivation
  • Outcome Assessment
  • Health Care
  • Pain
  • Physical Functional Performance
  • Social Isolation
  • Stereotyping
  • Surveys and Questionnaires

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Identifying outcomes for depression that matter to patients, informal caregivers, and health-care professionals: qualitative content analysis of a large international online survey'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this