TY - GEN
T1 - Variability of safety risks in production environments
AU - Dhungana, Deepak
AU - Haselböck, Alois
AU - Ruiz-Torrubiano, Rubén
AU - Wallner, Stefan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Owner/Author.
PY - 2022/9/12
Y1 - 2022/9/12
N2 - One of the major steps between (re-)configuration of a factory and the start of production is the commissioning phase, where certification of safety requirements and assessment of potential hazards is a key activity. Typically, assessment of safety risks is a manual process that incorporates the experience and knowledge of the involved stakeholders. The flexibility and the speed gained by automated (re-)configuration of production environments is decelerated by the manual safety certification process, before the factory can start production. This paper is an attempt to eliminate this bottleneck by proposing a model-driven approach to safety risk assessment. An approach based on several models of safety risks enables potential safety risks to be "instantiated"for any given factory at hand. This shortens the recurring process of identifying the risks. A model-driven approach was chosen to capture and utilize the tacit knowledge of the involved stakeholders.
AB - One of the major steps between (re-)configuration of a factory and the start of production is the commissioning phase, where certification of safety requirements and assessment of potential hazards is a key activity. Typically, assessment of safety risks is a manual process that incorporates the experience and knowledge of the involved stakeholders. The flexibility and the speed gained by automated (re-)configuration of production environments is decelerated by the manual safety certification process, before the factory can start production. This paper is an attempt to eliminate this bottleneck by proposing a model-driven approach to safety risk assessment. An approach based on several models of safety risks enables potential safety risks to be "instantiated"for any given factory at hand. This shortens the recurring process of identifying the risks. A model-driven approach was chosen to capture and utilize the tacit knowledge of the involved stakeholders.
KW - Risk assessment
KW - Automated identification
KW - Automated identification of risk
KW - Hazard in production environment
KW - Identification of risks
KW - Model-driven
KW - Model-driven commissioning
KW - Production environments
KW - Re-configurations
KW - Safety certification
KW - Safety risks
KW - Hazards
KW - model-driven commissioning
KW - hazards in production environments
KW - safety certification
KW - automated identification of risks
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85139168794&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1145/3546932.3547074
DO - 10.1145/3546932.3547074
M3 - Conference contribution
T3 - 26th ACM International Systems and Software Product Line Conference, SPLC 2022 - Proceedings
SP - 178
EP - 187
BT - 26th ACM International Systems and Software Product Line Conference, SPLC 2022 - Proceedings
PB - ACM
ER -